Gram Panchayat|LGD 218822Water profile

Vengasandra

Part of Kolar Gold Field block, Kolar district.

Watch

Every household has a tap, drawn from an aquifer in deficit

All 1,200 households report a tap connection, while Kolar Gold Field is assessed over exploited at 190.6 percent of extraction. Service is complete; the source is not secure.

100%
Households with a tap connection

1,200 of 1,200 households, across 10 habitations.

97
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, Open Well, Shallow Tubewell

190.6%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Kolar Gold Field is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

61.2 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

29 rain days between 2026-08-20 and 2026-09-19, modelled rather than gauged.

200d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-03-03. 108 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The marker is the centre of the villages the register lists under this Panchayat, drawn by DataMeet. The LGD export lists 286 of the district's 1,825 villages under its 154 Panchayats, one or two each, so the union of a Panchayat's listed villages is not its extent: no outline or area is drawn until the full village-to-Panchayat mapping is on file.

LGD Panchayat code
218822
Block
Kolar Gold Field
District
Kolar
Centroid
13.0148, 78.4042
Loading map
Plotted from the centre of the DataMeet polygons of the villages the register lists under this Panchayat. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; no outline is drawn.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
VENGASANDRA1,135273273
GOPENAHALLI780133133
ANASAGARA4238787
THATENAHALLI865183183
MALLAHALLI5989696
MUSTOOR250100100
SETHAMPALLI4019090
DASENAHALLI2436666
KODIGENAHALLI611120120
N.G. HULKUR GATE1835252

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water93
Open WellGround Water3
Shallow TubewellGround Water1

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Kolar Gold Field taluk, by village subdistrict code.

190.6%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Kolar Gold Field
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the register itself places this Panchayat's villages in.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Membership is the Local Government Directory's own statement: the taluk the Panchayat's covered villages sit in, joined to the IN-GRES unit by name. No polygon is intersected; a Panchayat whose taluk IN-GRES does not assess is deferred, never guessed. Blocks are the taluks themselves in this district, so no block spans more than one assessment unit.

Water-quality testing

108 samples between 2022-09-05 and 2026-03-03. 69 were taken at a source and 39 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
20224
202367
202413
202515
20269

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping. Summed over only the villages the register lists under this Panchayat, not all of its villages.

569.71 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 787.26 ha total.

390.88 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 66.13 ha, tanks 6.15 ha.

28 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 33.83 ha, forest 0 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009. Read from only the villages the register lists under this Panchayat.

4 source types were recorded for the year and 2 held through the summer months. These failed in summer: uncoveredWell, handPump.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

13 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (13)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • place boundary
  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body inventory
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (14)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • river water quality
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score