Gram Panchayat|LGD 168392Water profile

Nimgaon Korhale

Part of Rahta block, Ahilyanagar district.

Watch

Every household has a tap, drawn from an aquifer in deficit

All 1,246 households report a tap connection, while Rahta is assessed over exploited at 106.4 percent of extraction. Service is complete; the source is not secure.

100%
Households with a tap connection

1,246 of 1,246 households, across 4 habitations.

5
Drinking-water sources

Canal, Deep Tubewell, Lake, Open Well

106.4%
Groundwater extraction, containing talukataluka projection

Rahta is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluka, not this Panchayat.

75.6 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

30 rain days between 2026-08-03 and 2026-09-02, modelled rather than gauged.

41d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-07-27. 47 samples over 4 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent is DataMeet's community digitisation of the 2001 Census village map (ODbL), joined to the 2011 codes and dissolved to each Panchayat's member villages, so the place on the map is the place the register describes.

LGD Panchayat code
168392
Block
Rahta
District
Ahilyanagar
Mapped area
773.648 ha
Centroid
19.7783, 74.4592
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the DataMeet polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is indicative (a 2001-era digitisation), not a survey boundary. The 1 small markers are the water bodies the First Census of Water Bodies recorded in this Panchayat's villages, at the coordinates its enumerators entered.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Mal Wadi672135135
Nimgaon Korhale3,483704704
Nimgaon Wadi1,591321321
Nimse Wadi4148686

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Open WellGround Water2
Deep TubewellGround Water1
CanalSurface Water1
LakeSurface Water1

Groundwater, projected from the taluka

IN-GRES assesses revenue talukas. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluka's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluka categorytaluka projection

Rahta taluka, by village subdistrict code.

106.4%
stage of extraction, talukataluka projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluka. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Rahta
containing revenue talukataluka projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the register itself places this Panchayat's villages in.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluka, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its taluka's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Membership is the Local Government Directory's own statement: the taluka the Panchayat's covered villages sit in, joined to the IN-GRES unit by name. No polygon is intersected; a Panchayat whose taluka IN-GRES does not assess is deferred, never guessed. Blocks are the talukas themselves in this district, so no block spans more than one assessment unit.

Tanks and water bodies

Enumerated by the First Census of Water Bodies in this Panchayat's villages and placed here through the LGD's own village list, not by a name match.

1 water body is on the census return for this Panchayat: 1 water consv schemes/percolation tanks/check-dams. 1 of them carry a recorded coordinate, drawn on the map above.

The state's return enters template values for waterspread, depth, year and cost on every row, so those are not published: a count, a class and an owner are what it can support. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year. The return names 1 of them.

Census classWater bodies
Water consv schemes/percolation tanks/check-dams1
Owned byWater bodies
Panchayat1

Water-quality testing

47 samples between 2023-01-18 and 2026-07-27. 42 were taken at a source and 5 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
202311
202417
202514
20265

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

593 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 751 ha total.

43 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 275 ha, wells 275 ha, tanks 0 ha.

133 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 0 ha, forest 0 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

4 source types were recorded for the year and 1 held through the summer months. These failed in summer: tapTreated, handPump, tubeWell.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

16 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (11)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (13)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score