Gram Panchayat|LGD 168540Water profile

Karhe

Part of Sangamner block, Ahilyanagar district.

Watch

Every household has a tap, drawn from an aquifer in deficit

All 373 households report a tap connection, while Sangamner is assessed critical at 91.7 percent of extraction. Service is complete; the source is not secure.

100%
Households with a tap connection

373 of 373 households, across 5 habitations.

3
Drinking-water sources

Open Well, River

91.7%
Groundwater extraction, containing talukataluka projection

Sangamner is assessed critical. This describes the taluka, not this Panchayat.

49.6 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

29 rain days between 2026-08-03 and 2026-09-02, modelled rather than gauged.

37d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-07-31. 13 samples over 4 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent is DataMeet's community digitisation of the 2001 Census village map (ODbL), joined to the 2011 codes and dissolved to each Panchayat's member villages, so the place on the map is the place the register describes.

LGD Panchayat code
168540
Block
Sangamner
District
Ahilyanagar
Mapped area
1,518.871 ha
Centroid
19.6755, 74.1635
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the DataMeet polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is indicative (a 2001-era digitisation), not a survey boundary. The 4 small markers are the water bodies the First Census of Water Bodies recorded in this Panchayat's villages, at the coordinates its enumerators entered.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Bhabdwasti2985656
Karhe987191191
Khandobawadi3276363
Kholkad Wasti1082222
Langdewasti2194141

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Open WellGround Water2
RiverSurface Water1

Groundwater, projected from the taluka

IN-GRES assesses revenue talukas. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluka's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

critical
taluka categorytaluka projection

Sangamner taluka, by village subdistrict code.

91.7%
stage of extraction, talukataluka projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluka. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Sangamner
containing revenue talukataluka projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the register itself places this Panchayat's villages in.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluka, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its taluka's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Membership is the Local Government Directory's own statement: the taluka the Panchayat's covered villages sit in, joined to the IN-GRES unit by name. No polygon is intersected; a Panchayat whose taluka IN-GRES does not assess is deferred, never guessed. Blocks are the talukas themselves in this district, so no block spans more than one assessment unit.

Tanks and water bodies

Enumerated by the First Census of Water Bodies in this Panchayat's villages and placed here through the LGD's own village list, not by a name match.

4 water bodies are on the census return for this Panchayat: 4 water consv schemes/percolation tanks/check-dams. 4 of them carry a recorded coordinate, drawn on the map above.

The state's return enters template values for waterspread, depth, year and cost on every row, so those are not published: a count, a class and an owner are what it can support. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year. The return names 4 of them.

Census classWater bodies
Water consv schemes/percolation tanks/check-dams4
Owned byWater bodies
State WRD/State Irrigation4

Water-quality testing

13 samples between 2023-01-12 and 2026-07-31. 8 were taken at a source and 5 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
20233
20242
20254
20264

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

806 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 1,274 ha total.

356 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 150 ha, wells 300 ha, tanks 0 ha.

12 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 0 ha, forest 454 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

4 source types were recorded for the year and 3 held through the summer months. These failed in summer: coveredWell.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

16 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (11)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (13)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score