Gram Panchayat|LGD 224640Water profile

Velambadi

Part of Aravakurichi block, Karur district, in the Amaravathi sub-basin.

Watch

Every household has a tap, drawn from an aquifer in deficit

All 2,207 households report a tap connection, while Aravakurichi is assessed critical at 97.2 percent of extraction. Service is complete; the source is not secure.

100%
Households with a tap connection

2,207 of 2,207 households, across 25 habitations.

52
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, Infiltration well

97.2%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Aravakurichi is assessed critical. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

39.1 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

22 rain days between 2026-08-07 and 2026-09-06, modelled rather than gauged.

31d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-08-06. 254 samples over 4 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
224640
Block
Aravakurichi
District
Karur
Mapped area
2,043.202 ha
Centroid
10.7196, 77.8920
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is withheld pending the licence reply.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Anna Nagar1,200288288
Care Nagar975193193
Cresent Nagar402121
Dheen Nagar481515
Ellaipatti1114545
Gandhi Nagar2148080
Itchipatti1798484
Jj Nagar341313
M.g.r. Nagar862727
Mettupatti4899
Molayandipatti475137137
Mondiyuthankarai1024444
Murugan Nagar2466
Pappanaickenpatti475179179
Perumal Goundan Pudur1733
Ponnapuram375105105
Ponngoundanoor2457373
Poodhur421414
Puduvadi752020
Rengaraj Nagar860268268
Sampalparai Pudur421212
Sowndrapuram1,125370370
Tamil Nagar402111111
Vayakkattuthottam2355
Velampadi2508585

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water51
Infiltration wellGround Water1

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

critical
taluk categorytaluk projection

Aravakurichi taluk, by centroid in taluk.

97.2%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Aravakurichi
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 3 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

6 water bodies cover 16.3 ha here, the largest of them 7.9 ha. The register names 4 of them; the names and polygons are withheld pending the TNGIS licence reply.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
NRSC3
AED2
DOSS1

Water-quality testing

254 samples between 2023-04-22 and 2026-08-06. 237 were taken at a source and 17 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
202354
2024108
202531
202661

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

1,030.36 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 2,069.56 ha total.

558.19 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 558.19 ha, tanks 0 ha.

537.57 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 4.18 ha, forest 0 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

6 source types were recorded for the year and 6 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

16 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (11)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (13)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score