Gram Panchayat|LGD 225053Water profile

Badapalli

Part of Uthangarai block, Krishnagiri district.

Blocked

Taps are incomplete and the aquifer is already in deficit

90.27 percent of households report a tap connection, and Uthangarai is assessed over exploited at 148.9 percent of extraction. Closing the service gap draws on a source already over-drawn.

90.27%
Households with a tap connection

1,067 of 1,182 households, across 10 habitations.

17
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell

148.9%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Uthangarai is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

97.7 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

26 rain days between 2026-08-19 and 2026-09-18, modelled rather than gauged.

13d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-09-05. 113 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
225053
Block
Uthangarai
District
Krishnagiri
Mapped area
473.114 ha
Centroid
12.2735, 78.4810
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is not drawn on this page.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Baddapalli578136123
Kundalmaduv3559578
Padu Kadu747208205
Pattaganur519145119
Pattaganur Colony2999191
Periyaa Kanakam Patty558140140
Perumal Kuppam401110110
Rajboyankottai62233
Saratur3188767
Veerappan Kottai483147131

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water17

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Uthangarai taluk, by centroid in taluk.

148.9%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Uthangarai
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 5 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Water-quality testing

113 samples between 2022-10-14 and 2026-09-05. 69 were taken at a source and 44 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
20223
202324
202433
202532
202621

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

650.51 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 1,111.31 ha total.

81.59 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 81.59 ha, tanks 0 ha.

14.14 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 4.31 ha, forest 0 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

6 source types were recorded for the year and 6 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

14 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (12)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body inventory
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (14)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • river water quality
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score