Gram Panchayat|LGD 225105Water profile

Naduvanapalli

Part of Veppanapalli block, Krishnagiri district.

Blocked

Taps are incomplete and the aquifer is already in deficit

82.59 percent of households report a tap connection, and Krishnagiri is assessed over exploited at 101.2 percent of extraction. Closing the service gap draws on a source already over-drawn.

82.59%
Households with a tap connection

1,286 of 1,557 households, across 14 habitations.

23
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell

101.2%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Krishnagiri is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

95.1 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

27 rain days between 2026-08-19 and 2026-09-18, modelled rather than gauged.

15d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-09-03. 153 samples over 5 years, 1 recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
225105
Block
Veppanapalli
District
Krishnagiri
Mapped area
1,596.58 ha
Centroid
12.6766, 78.1840
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is not drawn on this page.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Athigunda (part)1405656
Dasiripalli1,366317272
Guruvareddypodur674119119
Inamkuttapalli1324040
Kannappan Kottai3499
Melur Kolla Kottai1855151
Melur.h1423434
Mgr Nagar Marapankottai1783737
Muthuraankottai4299
Naduvanapalli1,410272162
Oddakottai99193
Paraikkottai497107107
Ramachandiram1,598327227
Thadatharai927160160

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water23

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Krishnagiri taluk, by centroid in taluk.

101.2%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Krishnagiri
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 5 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

8 water bodies cover 49.5 ha here, the largest of them 20.9 ha. The register names 8 of them; the names and polygons are not shown on this page.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
TNRD5
NRSC3

Water-quality testing

153 samples between 2022-09-23 and 2026-09-03. 115 were taken at a source and 38 at households.

1 were recorded unsafe.

YearSamples
20226
202353
202436
202527
202631

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

854.72 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 1,929.49 ha total.

106.4 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 0 ha, tanks 106.4 ha.

184.24 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 39.23 ha, forest 249.49 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

7 source types were recorded for the year and 7 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

15 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (11)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (14)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • river water quality
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score