Gram Panchayat|LGD 227611Water profile

Dadhapuram

Part of Idappady block, Salem district, in the Tirumanimuttar sub-basin.

Watch

Every household has a tap, drawn from an aquifer in deficit

All 1,621 households report a tap connection, while Edappady is assessed over exploited at 133.0 percent of extraction. Service is complete; the source is not secure.

100%
Households with a tap connection

1,621 of 1,621 households, across 21 habitations.

39
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, River, Treated Surface Water

133.0%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Edappady is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

110.2 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

29 rain days between 2026-08-03 and 2026-09-02, modelled rather than gauged.

20d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-08-17. 299 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
227611
Block
Idappady
District
Salem
Mapped area
656.128 ha
Centroid
11.6230, 77.8770
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is withheld pending the licence reply.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Andi Kadu1443939
Dathapuram597182182
Dhanapattan Valavu442123123
Dhathapuram Kv3606262
Karthi Kanakkanur3499797
Kattuvalavu428117117
Kaveri Goundan Valavu324140140
Keel Karattu Patty2747676
Kundamani Panankadu1444141
Manakkadu2888080
Maniakaram Palayam2918585
MANIAKKARAM PALAYAM AD STREET3389494
Manuvelkadu2276363
Mavirusan Valavu2276767
Mel Karattupatty2456969
Meyyam Palayam1805050
Meyyampalayam Kv1625151
Mullakadu2346666
Puliyanthoppu2381919
Sambodai1624545
Varakanjan Valavu1805555

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water31
Treated Surface WaterSurface Water6
RiverSurface Water2

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Edappady taluk, by centroid in taluk.

133.0%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Edappady
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 6 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

11 water bodies cover 38.5 ha here, the largest of them 14.8 ha. The register names 11 of them; the names and polygons are withheld pending the TNGIS licence reply.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
DOSS4
NRSC4
TNRD3

Water-quality testing

299 samples between 2022-12-24 and 2026-08-17. 263 were taken at a source and 36 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
202235
202365
202467
202552
202680

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

280.92 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 659.35 ha total.

176.42 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 176.42 ha, tanks 0 ha.

0.9 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 11.46 ha, forest 0 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

5 source types were recorded for the year and 5 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

16 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (11)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (13)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score