Gram Panchayat|LGD 227671Water profile

Banapuram

Part of Mecheri block, Salem district, in the Tirumanimuttar sub-basin.

Blocked

Taps are incomplete and the aquifer is already in deficit

55.68 percent of households report a tap connection, and Mettur is assessed over exploited at 119.0 percent of extraction. Closing the service gap draws on a source already over-drawn.

55.68%
Households with a tap connection

730 of 1,311 households, across 16 habitations.

29
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, Treated Surface Water

119.0%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Mettur is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

116.6 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

29 rain days between 2026-08-03 and 2026-09-02, modelled rather than gauged.

45d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-07-23. 166 samples over 4 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
227671
Block
Mecheri
District
Salem
Mapped area
585.596 ha
Centroid
11.7879, 77.9528
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is withheld pending the licence reply.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Banapuram1393232
Karuppagoundan Valavu321810
Kooli Valavu503123123
Koppamkeelur3794343
Koppamkeelur Colony135340
Kuthiraikkaran Pudur3839898
Kuthiraikkaranur97919584
Muthampatti31712097
Muthampatti Erikadu174443
Muthampatti Kattuvalavu252632
Nadar Colony186400
Paruthikkaran Kattuvalavu3447171
Senkattur63915570
Sevidan Kattuvalavu255606
Sorangan Valavu240510
Veerappanur325101101

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water21
Treated Surface WaterSurface Water8

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Mettur taluk, by centroid in taluk.

119.0%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Mettur
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 6 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

3 water bodies cover 19.1 ha here, the largest of them 16.5 ha. The register names 1 of them; the names and polygons are withheld pending the TNGIS licence reply.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
AED2
TNRD1

Water-quality testing

166 samples between 2023-01-06 and 2026-07-23. 119 were taken at a source and 47 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
202337
202436
202557
202636

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

363 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 570.06 ha total.

63 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 63 ha, tanks 0 ha.

3.53 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 68.5 ha, forest 0 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

6 source types were recorded for the year and 4 held through the summer months. These failed in summer: tapTreated, tubeWell.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

16 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (11)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (13)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score