Gram Panchayat|LGD 227685Water profile

Virudhasampatti

Part of Mecheri block, Salem district, in the Tirumanimuttar sub-basin.

Watch

Every household has a tap, drawn from an aquifer in deficit

All 2,355 households report a tap connection, while Mettur is assessed over exploited at 119.0 percent of extraction. Service is complete; the source is not secure.

100%
Households with a tap connection

2,355 of 2,355 households, across 25 habitations.

47
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, River, Treated Surface Water

119.0%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Mettur is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

116.6 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

29 rain days between 2026-08-03 and 2026-09-02, modelled rather than gauged.

45d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-07-23. 243 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
227685
Block
Mecheri
District
Salem
Mapped area
1,098.118 ha
Centroid
11.8034, 77.8903
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is withheld pending the licence reply.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Gandhi Nagar1423737
Kaliyur508132132
Kanakkanur1273333
Kandanur1193131
Karikalan Nagar812121
Kattur624157157
Kundri Valavu620168168
Kuppanur1814747
M.g.r.nagar2005252
Mallappanur662172172
MALLAPPANUR PIRIVU691818
Mannathan Kadu1624242
Muniappankoil Kattuvalavu1544040
Nariyanur852222
Palankottai1,625422422
Palankottai Kattuvalavu412107107
Palli Theru421111
Periyakoothanur705183183
Pudur2436363
Santhipuram3739797
Senkaradu789185185
Senkaradu Ar Colony812121
Therkkathikkadu1423737
Vellakkaradu2356161
Virudasampatti987196196

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water30
Treated Surface WaterSurface Water16
RiverSurface Water1

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Mettur taluk, by centroid in taluk.

119.0%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Mettur
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 6 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

3 water bodies cover 51.8 ha here, the largest of them 38 ha. The register names 3 of them; the names and polygons are withheld pending the TNGIS licence reply.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
AED1
DOSS1
NRSC1

Water-quality testing

243 samples between 2022-12-15 and 2026-07-23. 203 were taken at a source and 40 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
202219
202355
202460
202550
202659

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

659 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 1,129.21 ha total.

209 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 209 ha, tanks 0 ha.

10.4 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 8.24 ha, forest 0 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

6 source types were recorded for the year and 6 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

16 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (11)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (13)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score