Gram Panchayat|LGD 227724Water profile
Thumbipadi
Part of Omalur block, Salem district, in the Tirumanimuttar sub-basin.
Taps are incomplete and the aquifer is already in deficit
99.38 percent of households report a tap connection, and Kadayampatti is assessed over exploited at 121.6 percent of extraction. Closing the service gap draws on a source already over-drawn.
3,362 of 3,383 households, across 27 habitations.
Deep Tubewell, River, Treated Surface Water
Kadayampatti is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.
30 rain days between 2026-08-03 and 2026-09-02, modelled rather than gauged.
Safe on 2026-08-11. 203 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.
Place and boundary
The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.
- LGD Panchayat code
- 227724
- Block
- Omalur
- District
- Salem
- Mapped area
- 1,423.516 ha
- Centroid
- 11.8073, 78.0848
Habitations
JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.
| Habitation | Population | Households | Tap connections |
|---|---|---|---|
| Athukadu | 346 | 97 | 97 |
| Athukadu Merku | 160 | 38 | 38 |
| Bodammakuttai | 316 | 86 | 86 |
| Guruvareddiyur | 864 | 250 | 250 |
| Kamanaicker Thottiar Theru | 108 | 35 | 35 |
| Katturan Kottai | 409 | 116 | 116 |
| KENDAPRIYAN VALASU | 797 | 215 | 215 |
| Kuthiraikuttipallam | 1,156 | 274 | 274 |
| Mamarathur | 336 | 95 | 95 |
| Molakkara Valavu | 318 | 86 | 86 |
| Mulli Chettipatty(ea | 588 | 155 | 155 |
| Mullichettipatty | 523 | 128 | 128 |
| MULLICHETTIPATTY AR | 568 | 148 | 148 |
| Odda Theru | 648 | 170 | 170 |
| Periya Naickanur | 230 | 68 | 68 |
| Periyanagalur | 396 | 112 | 112 |
| RAKKAM KV | 154 | 42 | 42 |
| Reddiyur Colony | 1,300 | 326 | 326 |
| Reddiyur Pudu Colony | 976 | 254 | 254 |
| Sarakkapillaiyur | 686 | 167 | 167 |
| SARAKKAPILLAIYUR AD | 205 | 52 | 52 |
| Sarakkapillaiyur Vadivelpillai Nagar | 155 | 34 | 13 |
| THINNAPATTY RS | 210 | 45 | 45 |
| Thonnapalli | 328 | 86 | 86 |
| Thottiar Theru | 206 | 46 | 46 |
| Thubipady Odda Theru | 180 | 40 | 40 |
| Thumbipady Ar | 872 | 218 | 218 |
Where the water comes from
The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.
| Source | Category | Count |
|---|---|---|
| Deep Tubewell | Ground Water | 35 |
| Treated Surface Water | Surface Water | 6 |
| River | Surface Water | 1 |
Groundwater, projected from the taluk
IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.
Kadayampatti taluk, by centroid in taluk.
Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.
Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.
The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 6 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.
Tanks and water bodies
Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.
3 water bodies cover 32.1 ha here, the largest of them 15.9 ha. The register names 3 of them; the names and polygons are withheld pending the TNGIS licence reply.
Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.
| Registered by | Water bodies |
|---|---|
| TNRD | 3 |
Water-quality testing
203 samples between 2022-12-31 and 2026-08-11. 175 were taken at a source and 28 at households.
None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.
| Year | Samples |
|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 |
| 2023 | 89 |
| 2024 | 40 |
| 2025 | 25 |
| 2026 | 48 |
Land and irrigation
Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.
of 1,397.51 ha total.
canal 0 ha, wells 252 ha, tanks 0 ha.
culturable waste; barren 67 ha, forest 0 ha.
Sources through the summer
Census 2011, reference year 2009.
7 source types were recorded for the year and 6 held through the summer months. These failed in summer: handPump.
This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.
What is missing
16 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.
Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.
- drinking water reliability
- groundwater level observation
- groundwater level trend
- aquifer context
- catchment context
- water body condition
- waterway network
- flood hazard
- observed flood events
- natural drainage
- wastewater service
These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.
- surface water change
- engineered stormwater drainage
- wastewater treatment assets
- pollution pressure inventory
- measured water pollution
- coastal and estuarine
- current crop and irrigation state
- soil water context
- agricultural water system relation
- crop water demand
- agricultural water stress observation
- agricultural water pollution pressure
- composite priority score