Gram Panchayat|LGD 227737Water profile

Neikkarapatty

Part of Panamarathupatti block, Salem district, in the Tirumanimuttar sub-basin.

Blocked

Taps are incomplete and the aquifer is already in deficit

92.34 percent of households report a tap connection, and Salem South is assessed over exploited at 145.5 percent of extraction. Closing the service gap draws on a source already over-drawn.

92.34%
Households with a tap connection

3,627 of 3,928 households, across 15 habitations.

23
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, Treated Surface Water

145.5%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Salem South is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

116.1 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

31 rain days between 2026-08-03 and 2026-09-02, modelled rather than gauged.

38d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-07-30. 191 samples over 4 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
227737
Block
Panamarathupatti
District
Salem
Mapped area
387.446 ha
Centroid
11.6150, 78.1081
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is withheld pending the licence reply.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Ammankoilkadu85516044
Annanagar51815353
Elanthoppu1,183285285
Elanthoppu-h1,07011631
Ettimarathu Kadu3729898
Kodikadu2,186858858
Kodikadu Colony1403535
Lakshminagar745219219
Malankadu867342342
Mettu Street1,885542542
Neduntharkadu1,257454454
Neikkarapatty1,309310310
Periyakulam406112112
Samathuvapuram495105105
Tharkadu514139139

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water17
Treated Surface WaterSurface Water6

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Salem South taluk, by centroid in taluk.

145.5%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Salem South
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 6 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

1 water body covers 0.6 ha here, the largest of them 0.6 ha. The register names 0 of them; the names and polygons are withheld pending the TNGIS licence reply.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
AED1

Water-quality testing

191 samples between 2023-01-05 and 2026-07-30. 156 were taken at a source and 35 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
202369
202442
202542
202638

What is missing

14 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (12)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • historical water access
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (14)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • historical agricultural baseline
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score