Gram Panchayat|LGD 232371Directory record

Oddapatti

Part of Jolarpet block, Tirupathur district.

Not characterised

No water profile is published for this place

Held back because place-identity-and-composition, population-and-settlements, drinking-water-service are not established for this place.

The Panchayat is listed so it can be found and reviewed. A profile is held back rather than published from evidence that cannot identify the place.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
232371
Block
Jolarpet
District
Tirupathur
Mapped area
91.824 ha
Centroid
12.5386, 78.5452
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is withheld pending the licence reply.

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Natrampalli taluk, by centroid in taluk.

165.5%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Natrampalli
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 4 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

439.24 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 580.34 ha total.

184 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 184 ha, tanks 0 ha.

13.6 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 3.57 ha, forest 0 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

6 source types were recorded for the year and 6 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

6 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (19)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • place identity and composition
  • population and settlements
  • drinking water service
  • drinking water source
  • drinking water reliability
  • drinking water quality
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body inventory
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • public water works
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
  • responsibility and action
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (15)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • connected supply system
  • surface water change
  • river water quality
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score