Gram Panchayat|LGD 167792Water profile
Kalyachiwadi (Group)
Part of Karjat block, Ahilyanagar district.
Universal taps on a source still within its limit
All 341 households report a tap connection and Karjat remains assessed safe at 59.5 percent of extraction.
341 of 341 households, across 7 habitations.
Open Well
Karjat is assessed safe. This describes the taluka, not this Panchayat.
Safe on 2026-08-04. 10 samples over 3 years, none of them recorded unsafe.
Habitations
JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.
| Habitation | Population | Households | Tap connections |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jiraf Wasti | 173 | 36 | 36 |
| Kalyachiwadi | 330 | 55 | 55 |
| Mandhare Wasti | 55 | 13 | 13 |
| Vittal Nagar | 128 | 22 | 22 |
| Bhitade Wasti | 125 | 25 | 25 |
| Raukalewadi (n.v.) | 735 | 147 | 147 |
| Wetal Wasti | 169 | 43 | 43 |
Where the water comes from
The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.
| Source | Category | Count |
|---|---|---|
| Open Well | Ground Water | 1 |
Groundwater, projected from the taluka
IN-GRES assesses revenue talukas. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluka's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.
Karjat taluka, by village subdistrict code.
Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluka. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.
Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the register itself places this Panchayat's villages in.
The assessment unit is a revenue taluka, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its taluka's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Membership is the Local Government Directory's own statement: the taluka the Panchayat's covered villages sit in, joined to the IN-GRES unit by name. No polygon is intersected; a Panchayat whose taluka IN-GRES does not assess is deferred, never guessed. Blocks are the talukas themselves in this district, so no block spans more than one assessment unit.
Water-quality testing
10 samples between 2024-01-02 and 2026-08-04. 10 were taken at a source and 0 at households.
None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.
| Year | Samples |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 4 |
| 2025 | 4 |
| 2026 | 2 |
Land and irrigation
Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.
of 758 ha total.
canal 50 ha, wells 135 ha, tanks 0 ha.
culturable waste; barren 72 ha, forest 0 ha.
Sources through the summer
Census 2011, reference year 2009.
3 source types were recorded for the year and 2 held through the summer months. These failed in summer: riverCanal.
This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.
What is missing
12 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.
Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.
- place boundary
- drinking water reliability
- current rainfall
- rainfall anomaly
- groundwater level observation
- groundwater level trend
- aquifer context
- catchment context
- water body inventory
- water body condition
- waterway network
- flood hazard
- observed flood events
- natural drainage
- wastewater service
These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.
- surface water change
- engineered stormwater drainage
- wastewater treatment assets
- pollution pressure inventory
- measured water pollution
- coastal and estuarine
- current crop and irrigation state
- soil water context
- agricultural water system relation
- crop water demand
- agricultural water stress observation
- agricultural water pollution pressure
- composite priority score