Gram Panchayat|LGD 224649Water profile

Gudalur East

Part of K.Paramathi block, Karur district, in the Amaravathi sub-basin.

Watch

Every household has a tap, drawn from an aquifer in deficit

All 1,339 households report a tap connection, while Aravakurichi is assessed critical at 97.2 percent of extraction. Service is complete; the source is not secure.

100%
Households with a tap connection

1,339 of 1,339 households, across 23 habitations.

56
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, Infiltration well, Open Well

97.2%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Aravakurichi is assessed critical. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

43.1 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

28 rain days between 2026-08-07 and 2026-09-06, modelled rather than gauged.

29d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-08-08. 258 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
224649
Block
K.Paramathi
District
Karur
Mapped area
2,436.689 ha
Centroid
10.8901, 77.8158
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is withheld pending the licence reply.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Ambethkar Colony1364343
Anaipudhur2915656
Chinna Mathiya Gudalur1824242
Chinna Thiru Mangalam2465353
Dharmakodankipatti922727
Gandhinagar321010
Gudalur Puthur451919
Kailasapuram602121
Kamachipuram2129090
Kattupalayam952626
Kongu Nagar2105050
M.g.r.nagar450145145
Malachiyur1563535
Molaiyandi Patti1102828
Nadu Palayam1953333
Othamandurai654135135
Panayampalayam408133133
Periya Madhiya Gudalur3258181
Pillaiyarpalayam1577
Ponnagar722424
Rengapalayam705163163
Selvanagar4599292
Velliyampalayam1142626

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water38
Infiltration wellGround Water17
Open WellGround Water1

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

critical
taluk categorytaluk projection

Aravakurichi taluk, by centroid in taluk.

97.2%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Aravakurichi
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 3 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

6 water bodies cover 7.1 ha here, the largest of them 4.7 ha. The register names 6 of them; the names and polygons are withheld pending the TNGIS licence reply.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
NRSC6

Water-quality testing

258 samples between 2022-10-08 and 2026-08-08. 142 were taken at a source and 116 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
202214
202334
202466
2025123
202621

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

524.45 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 2,443.15 ha total.

339.35 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 339.35 ha, tanks 0 ha.

948.59 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 12.39 ha, forest 0 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

7 source types were recorded for the year and 7 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

16 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (11)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (13)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score