Gram Panchayat|LGD 224668Water profile

Thennilai West

Part of K.Paramathi block, Karur district, in the Amaravathi sub-basin.

Watch

Every household has a tap, drawn from an aquifer in deficit

All 818 households report a tap connection, while Pugalur is assessed over exploited at 108.5 percent of extraction. Service is complete; the source is not secure.

100%
Households with a tap connection

818 of 818 households, across 26 habitations.

29
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, Infiltration well, River

108.5%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Pugalur is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

55.4 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

28 rain days between 2026-08-07 and 2026-09-06, modelled rather than gauged.

29d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-08-08. 81 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
224668
Block
K.Paramathi
District
Karur
Mapped area
2,576.239 ha
Centroid
10.9807, 77.8294
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is withheld pending the licence reply.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Arikkaran Palayam592525
Athikattur261111
Avuthipalayam1584949
Chinnathottampudur2699
Chinnavangalam Palayam1655959
Devandrapuram721919
Eichi Kattur843333
Ellaikadu311
Ellaimedu351111
Kachaikattivalasu692323
Kallikattur722
Karaithottampudur842424
Koonampatti626138138
Kullampalayam2529090
Mgr Nagar1566868
Nadarpathi2444
Palakattur681919
Pariayur1066
Perakkampalayam2397575
Periyavangalampalayam822
Perumal Goundan Pudur1094545
Puliyampatti562727
Thennilai West241616
Thoppur1434545
Vadapalani311010
Velliankkattur1477

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water25
RiverSurface Water3
Infiltration wellGround Water1

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Pugalur taluk, by centroid in taluk.

108.5%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Pugalur
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 3 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

8 water bodies cover 9.4 ha here, the largest of them 3.5 ha. The register names 8 of them; the names and polygons are withheld pending the TNGIS licence reply.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
NRSC8

Water-quality testing

81 samples between 2022-11-12 and 2026-08-08. 61 were taken at a source and 20 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
202210
202318
202421
202521
202611

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

343.02 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 2,611.26 ha total.

29.14 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 29.14 ha, tanks 0 ha.

830.02 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 35.63 ha, forest 0 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

6 source types were recorded for the year and 6 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

16 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (11)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (13)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score