Gram Panchayat|LGD 230249Water profile

Kodumbapatti

Part of Marungapuri block, Tiruchirappalli district, in the Mettur Reservoir to Noyyal confluence sub-basin.

Watch

Every household has a tap, drawn from an aquifer in deficit

All 668 households report a tap connection, while Marungapuri is assessed over exploited at 119.6 percent of extraction. Service is complete; the source is not secure.

100%
Households with a tap connection

668 of 668 households, across 14 habitations.

27
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, Infiltration well

119.6%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Marungapuri is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

81.6 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

30 rain days between 2026-08-01 and 2026-08-31, modelled rather than gauged.

4d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-08-27. 251 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
230249
Block
Marungapuri
District
Tiruchirappalli
Mapped area
646.524 ha
Centroid
10.4528, 78.5357
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is withheld pending the licence reply.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Chinnaaurlapatti1133030
Kannakonpannai3163737
Keelakurichipatti4423030
Kodumbapatti1,1318282
Koviledayanpatti802020
Kulunthampatti360104104
Medu Kadu1352929
North Sokkanathapatti1743939
Palathupatti2683030
Parusampatti1043131
Periyarulapatti9277
Thoovankulavaipatti1012525
Thulukampatti420104104
Vairampatti312100100

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water20
Infiltration wellGround Water7

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Marungapuri taluk, by centroid in taluk.

119.6%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Marungapuri
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 1 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

34 water bodies cover 95.4 ha here, the largest of them 27.3 ha. The register names 21 of them; the names and polygons are withheld pending the TNGIS licence reply.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
TNRD19
AED13
NRSC2

Water-quality testing

251 samples between 2022-12-14 and 2026-08-27. 120 were taken at a source and 131 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
202210
202368
202463
202556
202654

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

724.66 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 2,657.46 ha total.

541.14 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 488.15 ha, tanks 52.99 ha.

17.33 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 1.78 ha, forest 209.07 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

8 source types were recorded for the year and 8 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

15 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (11)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (14)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • river water quality
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score