Gram Panchayat|LGD 230478Water profile

Palayakottai

Part of Vaiyampatty block, Tiruchirappalli district, in the Mettur Reservoir to Noyyal confluence sub-basin.

Blocked

Taps are incomplete and the aquifer is already in deficit

53.03 percent of households report a tap connection, and Manapparai is assessed over exploited at 143.0 percent of extraction. Closing the service gap draws on a source already over-drawn.

53.03%
Households with a tap connection

1,250 of 2,357 households, across 22 habitations.

44
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell, Open Well, Shallow Tubewell

143.0%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Manapparai is assessed over exploited. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

42.6 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

25 rain days between 2026-08-01 and 2026-08-31, modelled rather than gauged.

16d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-08-15. 270 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
230478
Block
Vaiyampatty
District
Tiruchirappalli
Mapped area
2,267.24 ha
Centroid
10.5938, 78.3256
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is withheld pending the licence reply.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Annanagar511515
Anukkanatham693213103
Appanampatti1202929
Azad Road982525
Inamrediapatti55218474
Inamrediapatti Puthur2769292
Kalathu Veedu Kalam2456624
Kalkothanoor48513916
Kurumbapatti59719988
Madhanagar511616
Malapatti1505036
Mettukalam1053535
Moorampatti41512530
Nagampatti3109755
Nochimedu1013030
Onthampatti581193193
Palayakottai2658052
Pechakampatty1956115
Purathakudi1,131377196
Thopoopatti65421830
Uppathupatti1855336
Vellaipoolampatti1856060

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water40
Open WellGround Water3
Shallow TubewellGround Water1

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

over-exploited
taluk categorytaluk projection

Manapparai taluk, by centroid in taluk.

143.0%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Manapparai
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 1 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

23 water bodies cover 66.7 ha here, the largest of them 15.5 ha. The register names 9 of them; the names and polygons are withheld pending the TNGIS licence reply.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
AED14
TNRD7
NRSC2

Water-quality testing

270 samples between 2022-09-21 and 2026-08-15. 162 were taken at a source and 108 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
202231
202374
202456
202579
202630

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

960.98 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 2,255.66 ha total.

487.44 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 487.44 ha, tanks 0 ha.

8.85 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 2.14 ha, forest 0 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

8 source types were recorded for the year and 7 held through the summer months. These failed in summer: tankPondLake.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

15 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (11)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (14)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • river water quality
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score