Gram Panchayat|LGD 229612Water profile

Kuppamkandigai

Part of Tiruvalangadu block, Tiruvallur district.

Not characterised

Containing taluk assessed semi critical

Tiruttani is assessed semi critical at 70.3 percent of extraction. This is containing-area context, not a measurement of this place.

100%
Households with a tap connection

1,585 of 1,585 households, across 7 habitations.

28
Drinking-water sources

Deep Tubewell

70.3%
Groundwater extraction, containing taluktaluk projection

Tiruttani is assessed semi critical. This describes the taluk, not this Panchayat.

75.7 mm
Rainfall, last 30 days

31 rain days between 2026-08-07 and 2026-09-06, modelled rather than gauged.

23d ago
Last water-quality sample

Safe on 2026-08-14. 238 samples over 5 years, none of them recorded unsafe.

Place and boundary

The mapped extent comes from the TNGIS Panchayat polygon for this LGD code, so the place on the map is the place the records describe.

LGD Panchayat code
229612
Block
Tiruvalangadu
District
Tiruvallur
Mapped area
132.051 ha
Centroid
13.1015, 79.8188
Loading map
Plotted from the centroid of the TNGIS polygon. The marker is the Panchayat, not a settlement; the polygon is not drawn on this page.

Habitations

JJM records service for each habitation separately. A Panchayat total can hide a habitation that is behind.

HabitationPopulationHouseholdsTap connections
Ambethkar Nagar1196767
Kabul Kandigai1,029395395
Kuppamkandigai1,238334334
Kuppamkandigai Colony390107107
Manavoor1,797320320
Mettu Colony892230230
Palla Colony951132132

Where the water comes from

The schemes JJM records as serving this Panchayat, grouped by the kind of source they draw on.

SourceCategoryCount
Deep TubewellGround Water28

Groundwater, projected from the taluk

IN-GRES assesses revenue taluks. This Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place.

semi-critical
taluk categorytaluk projection

Tiruttani taluk, by centroid in taluk.

70.3%
stage of extraction, taluktaluk projection

Groundwater drawn each year as a share of what recharges, for the whole taluk. Above 100 is more drawn than recharges.

Tiruttani
containing revenue taluktaluk projection

Sub-district on the revenue hierarchy, which the Panchayat hierarchy does not nest inside.

The assessment unit is a revenue taluk, not the Gram Panchayat: each Panchayat inherits its containing taluk's category and stage of extraction unchanged, as containing-area context rather than a measurement of the place. Containment is decided by the TNGIS polygon centroid (vertex fallback for concave polygons); a Panchayat that falls in no taluk or in a taluk without an assessment is deferred, never guessed. 6 TNRD blocks span more than one revenue taluk, so a block-to-taluk name match would have been wrong.

Tanks and water bodies

Mapped by TNGIS and assigned to this Panchayat by the register itself, not by a name match.

1 water body covers 18.9 ha here, the largest of them 18.9 ha. The register names 1 of them; the names and polygons are not shown on this page.

Waterspread is the mapped extent, not storage. It says nothing about whether these hold water through the year, whether they are encroached, or when any one of them was last surveyed.

Registered byWater bodies
TNRD1

Water-quality testing

238 samples between 2022-09-07 and 2026-08-14. 141 were taken at a source and 97 at households.

None was recorded unsafe. A clean run this long describes the reporting as much as the water, so read it as an absence of recorded failures rather than as evidence of safety.

YearSamples
20229
202347
2024105
202551
202626

Land and irrigation

Census 2011, reference year 2009. A historical baseline, not current cropping.

81.32 ha
net area sown
Census 2011

of 431.66 ha total.

79.84 ha
irrigated
Census 2011

canal 0 ha, wells 79.84 ha, tanks 0 ha.

62.08 ha
not cultivated
Census 2011

culturable waste; barren 0 ha, forest 0 ha.

Sources through the summer

Census 2011, reference year 2009.

3 source types were recorded for the year and 3 held through the summer months. None failed.

This is the 2009 pattern and says nothing about whether today’s piped supply holds through summer.

What is missing

16 of 40 capabilities are supported by acquired evidence. The rest are named here rather than left blank.

Named gap
No source carries it (11)

Nothing acquired for this district answers these, so they are named rather than estimated.

  • drinking water reliability
  • groundwater level observation
  • groundwater level trend
  • aquifer context
  • catchment context
  • water body condition
  • waterway network
  • flood hazard
  • observed flood events
  • natural drainage
  • wastewater service
Named gap
Not determined whether it applies here (13)

These may not be meaningful for an inland rural Panchayat. Until that is decided, they are neither claimed nor dismissed.

  • surface water change
  • engineered stormwater drainage
  • wastewater treatment assets
  • pollution pressure inventory
  • measured water pollution
  • coastal and estuarine
  • current crop and irrigation state
  • soil water context
  • agricultural water system relation
  • crop water demand
  • agricultural water stress observation
  • agricultural water pollution pressure
  • composite priority score